Search "Turnitin Nepal" and a lot of what comes up is someone offering to sell you login access to the software itself — a Turnitin account, a premium subscription, a shared login. We don't do that, and it isn't what you actually need. What gets your document past a supervisor is the check being run properly and the result explained, not a piece of software with your name on it.
Most Nepali students meet Turnitin as a number handed back by a department with no explanation attached. A percentage on its own tells you almost nothing — a 22% made up of a correctly quoted methodology and a properly cited reference list is fine, while a 9% sitting in one unbroken block of someone else's argument is the one that gets referred.
Assignment Nepal runs the check, sends you the full report rather than the figure, and goes through the flagged passages with you: which are quoted material, which are standard definitions your discipline cannot avoid, which are references that need rewording, and which genuinely need rewriting before you submit.
We do not sell a way around Turnitin, and nobody honest does. Text spinners and AI paraphrasers leave their own signature, and Nepali departments increasingly run the AI-writing indicator alongside the similarity score. What actually lowers a real similarity score is citation, quotation marks in the right places, and rewriting the passages that are genuinely too close to the source.
Similarity and AI writing indicator reports come with every delivery, and we run them on work you wrote yourself too. You get the reports and the explanation, never a bare figure.
We are an independent academic support service, not a university and not a reseller of any detection platform. We run checks and issue the resulting reports; we do not sell access to a detection tool, and we do not sell a way around one.
Tell us what you need checked and when it is due. Your document is checked without being stored in any student-paper repository, so the check never counts against your real submission. The reports come back with what each match means, not just a percentage.
Students ask constantly what percentage is safe, and the honest answer is that no national standard exists. Departments set their own limits and they differ widely — some TU affiliated campuses work to 20%, some KU programmes to 15%, some supervisors judge the report rather than the number and set no figure at all. Ask your department directly and get the answer in writing if you can, because a number a senior passed down two batches ago is not a policy.
What the figure includes also varies. A report that counts the reference list and the block quotations will read much higher than one configured to exclude them, and the same submission can produce two very different percentages depending on those settings. When a supervisor says your similarity is too high, the first question worth asking is what the report was set to exclude.
This is why we send the report rather than the score. Two submissions at 18% can be in completely different positions — one spread thinly across dozens of correctly cited sources, the other concentrated in three paragraphs lifted from one paper. Only the first is fine, and only the report tells you which one you have.
Turnitin's AI writing indicator is not part of the similarity percentage. It is a distinct figure, it is reported separately, and Nepali departments have been switching it on steadily. A submission can show 4% similarity and still be referred on the AI score, which catches students who assumed a low similarity number meant they were clear.
The indicator is also less predictable than the similarity match. Similarity points at a specific source you can open and compare; the AI score is a probability estimate with no passage-level source behind it, and it can flag heavily edited, formal or non-native-speaker prose. That cuts against Nepali students writing in English as a second or third language, and there is no clean way to appeal a number that has no source attached.
The practical protection is a drafting trail. Keep your outline, your notes, your earlier drafts and your supervisor's comments, with the file dates intact. A student who can show the work developing over three weeks is in a far stronger position than one who can only show the finished file, whatever any indicator says.
Sort the matches into three groups before changing a word. Correctly quoted and cited material — leave it alone; it is supposed to match. Standard terminology, instrument names, statutory wording and common definitions your discipline cannot phrase any other way — usually defensible, and often excludable in the report settings. Uncited text that tracks a source closely — this is the group that needs work, and it is normally much smaller than the percentage suggests.
For that third group, rewriting means rebuilding the sentence from the idea, not swapping synonyms. Reading the passage, closing the source, and writing what it said in your own words produces text that is genuinely yours; running it through a paraphrasing tool produces text that is often still structurally identical and now also carries an AI signature. Add the citation either way — paraphrased material still needs one.
Then re-run the check before submitting, not after. A second report costs little and tells you whether the rewriting actually worked, which is a much better position than discovering it did not when the department sends the file back.
No — we don't sell or resell Turnitin accounts, and any service that does is operating outside Turnitin's own terms. What we offer is the check itself: we run your document through an institutional account and send back the full report with every flagged passage explained. That's the part that actually gets you ready for submission, not the software.
Send the file on WhatsApp with your deadline. You get the price and turnaround back before anything is charged, then the report itself once the check is done, with the flagged passages explained rather than a bare number.
There is no single national threshold. Departments set their own, and the figures in circulation range widely — some Nepali institutions work to around 15 to 20 percent, others are stricter for postgraduate theses. Ask your department for its actual written limit, because a number a senior quoted you may not be the one your supervisor applies.
No, and treat anyone who promises it with suspicion. A properly referenced academic document will always match something — your own reference list, standard definitions, the names of instruments and Acts, and any material you have correctly quoted. The goal is a score your department accepts with a report that explains itself, not zero.
Turnitin runs an AI-writing indicator separately from the similarity score, and Nepali departments are increasingly looking at both. A document can show low similarity and still be referred on the AI indicator, which is why paraphrasing tools are a poor answer to a similarity problem.
No. Our checks do not add your document to the repository your university submits against, so your own final submission will not match against the draft you sent us.
Yes, and that is a large part of what we do. Send the draft and we return the report with the flagged passages explained, whether or not we had anything to do with writing it.
Usually not. A bibliography matches every other document citing the same sources, which is exactly what it should do. Many departments exclude the reference list from the score, and where yours does not, the report shows plainly that the match is bibliographic.
100%. Your identity and academic work stay completely private and are never shared with your college or anyone else. We use secure, encrypted communication.
Message us on WhatsApp at +977 9768768340 with your assignment brief and deadline, and we'll reply with a transparent quote — usually within a couple of hours.